Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872360›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2023

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Technique in Hand Surgery: The Patient Experience.

Matthew Pina, Antonio Cusano, Matthew R LeVasseur, Rafael Olivieri-Ortiz, Joel Ferreira, Anthony Parrino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. From wide awake surgery to office surgery.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew PinaUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-4205
Antonio CusanoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-1922
Matthew R LeVasseurUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Rafael Olivieri-OrtizUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
Joel FerreiraUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Anthony ParrinoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
UConn Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe attempted to evaluate patient satisfaction and overall experience during wide awake, local anesthesia, with no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery and quantify surgery-related outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and patient reported outcomes via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores collected pre- and postoperatively of patients undergoing WALANT surgery by the 2 participating senior authors. A solution of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was used by 1 surgeon, while the other used a 1:1 ratio of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine for local anesthetic injection. Patients were administered a postoperative survey to assess patient experience, including anxiety and pain levels, and overall satisfaction in the perioperative period.

resultsOverall, 97.7% of patients indicated that they would undergo a WALANT-style surgery if indicated in the future, 70.5% ate the day of surgery, and a total of 39.1% of patients reported driving to and from surgery. Postoperative SANE scores increased as compared with preoperative scores across all patients. The use of combination 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine was associated with lower intraoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores.

conclusionsWALANT hand surgery was generally well tolerated with excellent surgical outcomes. Patients reported ease of preparation for surgery, faster recovery, and lack of anesthetic side effects as the main benefits of wide-awake surgery. Combination use of lidocaine and bupivacaine may be better than lidocaine alone with respect to pain control in the initial recovery period.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalBrain NeoplasmsBupivacaineEpinephrineHandHumansLidocainePainPatient Outcome AssessmentRetrospective StudiesWakefulnessBupivacaineEpinephrineLidocainelocal anesthesiapatient experiencepatient satisfactionwide awake hand surgery

Identifiers

PMID34872360
PMCPMC10233642
OpenAlexW4200622041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.