Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872147›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

First Baby Born in Brazil after Simultaneous Diagnosis through Non-Invasive and Conventional PGT-A.

Marcos Iuri Roos Kulmann, Márcia Riboldi, Carolina Martello, Adriana Bos-Mikich, Gerta Frantz, Caroline Dutra, Luiza Mezzomo Donatti, Norma Oliveira, Nilo Frantz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Great Challenges Remain for niPGT-A Reliability.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcos Iuri Roos KulmannNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-477X
Márcia RiboldiIgenomix Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-4428
Carolina MartelloNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2133-8399
Adriana Bos-MikichDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5704-1936
Gerta FrantzNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-3662
Caroline DutraNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-1388
Luiza Mezzomo DonattiNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0792-0662
Norma OliveiraNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-6941
Nilo FrantzNilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4671-408X
National Institute on Population Medical Genetics · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) aiming to assess cell-free embryonic DNA in spent culture media is promising, especially because it might overcome the diminished rates of implantation caused by the inadequate performance of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Our center is part of the largest study to date assessing the concordance between conventional PGT-A and niPGT-A, and we report here the delivery of the first baby born in Brazil using niPGT-A. The parents of the baby were admitted to our center in 2018. They did not present history of infertility, and they were interested in using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGT-A in order to avoid congenital anomalies in the offspring. A total of 11 (3 day-5 and 8 day-6) expanded blastocysts were biopsied, and the spent culture media (culture from day-4 to day-6) from 8 day-6 blastocysts were collected for niPGT-A. Overall, 7 embryos yielded informative results for trophectoderm (TE) and media samples. Among the embryos with informative results, 5 presented concordant diagnosis between conventional PGT-A and niPGT-A, and 2 presented discordant diagnosis (1 false-positive and one false-negative). The Blastocyst 4, diagnosed as 46, XY by both niPGT-A and conventional PGT-A, was warmed up and transferred, resulting in the birth of a healthy 3.8 kg boy in February 2020. Based on our results and the recent literature, we believe that the safest current application of niPGT-A would be as a method of embryo selection for patients without an indication for conventional PGT-A. The approximate 80% of reliability of niPGT-A in the diagnosis of ploidy is superior to predictions provided by other non-invasive approaches like morphology and morphokinetics selection.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyBlastocystBrazilFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansMalePregnancyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34872147
PMCPMC10183898
OpenAlexW4200555650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.