ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2021
Ultrasensitive qPCR-Based Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in Pregnant Women Using Dried Blood or Whole Blood Pellet Samples Processed through Different DNA Extraction Methods.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of monthly intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine with and without azithromycin versus monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Africa: a double-blind randomised, partly placebo-controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Highly sensitive molecular techniques for the detection of low-level Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia are highly useful for various clinical and epidemiological studies. However, differences in how blood samples are preserved, the quantity of blood stored, as well as genomic DNA extraction methods used may compromise the potential usefulness of these methodologies. This study compared diagnostic sensitivity based on microscopy and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) P. falciparum positivity of dried blood spots (DBS) or whole blood pellets (WBP) from pregnant women using different DNA extraction protocols (Chelex-saponin or a commercial kit). Samples from 129 pregnant women were analyzed, of which 13 were P. falciparum positive by mRDT and 5 by microscopy. By using extraction kit on WBP and on DBS, qPCR positivity was 27 (20.9%) and 16 (12.4%), respectively, whereas Chelex extraction on DBS only resulted in 4 (3.1%) P. falciparum positive samples. Thus, extraction using commercial kits greatly improve the likelihood of detecting P. falciparum infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.