ArticleDNA repair2022
Incorporation of 5',8-cyclo-2'deoxyadenosines by DNA repair polymerases via base excision repair.
Article in DNA repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unscheduled mInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biological Models of Oxidative Purine DNA Damage in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mapping medically relevant RNA isoform diversity in the aged human frontal cortex with deep long-read RNA-seq.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Using deep long-read RNAseq in Alzheimer's disease brain to assess medical relevance of RNA isoform diversity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- RNA-guided DNA base damage repair via DNA polymerase-mediated nick translation.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Polymerases and DNA Repair in Neurons: Implications in Neuronal Survival and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
5',8-cyclo-2-deoxy nucleosides (cdPus) are the smallest tandem purine lesions including 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine (cdA) and 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyguanosine (cdG). They can inhibit DNA and RNA polymerases causing mutations, DNA strand breaks, and termination of DNA replication and gene transcription. cdPus can be removed by nucleotide excision repair with low efficiency allowing them to accumulate in the genome. Recent studies suggest that cdPus can be induced in damaged nucleotide pools and incorporated into the genome by DNA polymerases. However, it remains unknown if and how DNA polymerases can incorporate cdPus. In this study, we examined the incorporation of cdAs by human DNA repair polymerases, DNA polymerases β (pol β), and pol η during base excision repair. We then determined the efficiency of cdA incorporation by the polymerases using steady-state kinetics. We found that pol β and pol η incorporated cdAs opposite dT and dC with low efficiency, and incorporated cdAs were readily extended and ligated into duplex DNA. Using molecular docking analysis, we found that the 5',8-covalent bond in cdA disrupted its hydrogen bonding with a template base suggesting that the phosphodiester bond between the 3'-terminus nucleotide and the α-phosphate of cdATP were generated in the absence of hydrogen bonding. The enzyme kinetics analysis further suggests that pol β and pol η increased their substrate binding to facilitate the enzyme catalysis for cdA incorporation. Our study reveals unique mechanisms underlying the accumulation of cdPu lesions in the genome resulting from nucleotide incorporation by repair DNA polymerases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.