Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871853›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

The effects of organizational climate on adherence to guidelines for COVID-19 prevention.

Philipp Hubert, Sascha Abdel Hadi, Andreas Mojzisch, Jan Alexander Häusser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philipp HubertDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35394 Giessen, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.hubert@psychol.uni-giessen.de.
Sascha Abdel HadiDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35394 Giessen, Germany.
Andreas MojzischInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany.
Jan Alexander HäusserDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35394 Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the current pandemic, it is essential that individuals follow the COVID-19 guidelines (e.g., physical distancing) to slow down the spread of the new coronavirus. Organizations generally affect their employees' behavior in a wide range of areas, but can they also affect how strictly employees adhere to COVID-19 guidelines? To answer this question, the present study examined the impact of an organizational climate for preventing infectious diseases (OCID) on employees' adherence to COVID-19 guidelines both at work and in their private life.

methodWe used a two-wave longitudinal online survey with a final sample of N = 304 UK employees.

resultsOur results show that OCID during the first lockdown in the UK in April 2020 (T1) was positively linked to adherence to COVID-19 guidelines at work one month later (T2). We also found a relationship between OCID (T1) and adherence to guidelines in one's private life (T2) that was mediated through adherence to guidelines at work (T2).

conclusionThese results highlight the pivotal role organizations play in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 preventionHealth behaviorOrganizational climateWork to private spillover

Identifiers

PMID34871853
PMCPMC8629794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.