Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871800›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2022

Survival of the salient: Aversive learning rescues otherwise forgettable memories via neural reactivation and post-encoding hippocampal connectivity.

David Clewett, Joseph Dunsmoor, Shelby L Bachman, Elizabeth A Phelps, Lila Davachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mood-congruent memory revisited.Psychological review · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David ClewettDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Psychology, New York University, United States.
Joseph DunsmoorDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, United States.
Shelby L BachmanDepartment of Psychology, New York University, United States; Department of Gerontology, University of Southern California, United States.
Elizabeth A PhelpsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, United States.
Lila DavachiDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, United States; Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, United States. Electronic address: ld24@columbia.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN GERONTOLOGYT32AG000037 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, EILEEN M CRIMMINS · 1985 to 2026
$13.2M
Medial temporal lobe contributions to episodic memoryR01MH074692 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DAVACHI, LILA · 2007 to 2021
$5.9M
Training Systems and Integrative NeuroscienceT32MH019524 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIORPES, LYNNE · 1992 to 2025
$5.2M
Arousal Mechanisms of Episodic Memory OrganizationF32MH114536 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CLEWETT, DAVID VAUGHN · 2018 to 2019
$120k
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000037NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH114536NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074692NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of aversive events on memory are complex and go beyond the simple enhancement of threatening information. Negative experiences can also rescue related but otherwise forgettable details encoded close in time. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy young adults to examine the brain mechanisms that support this retrograde memory effect. In a two-phase incidental encoding paradigm, participants viewed different pictures of tools and animals before and during Pavlovian fear conditioning. During Phase 1, these images were intermixed with neutral scenes, which provided a unique 'context tag' for this specific phase of encoding. A few minutes later, during Phase 2, new pictures from one category were paired with a mild shock (threat-conditioned stimulus; CS+), while pictures from the other category were not shocked. FMRI analyses revealed that, across-participants, individuals who showed aversive learning-related retroactive memory benefits for Phase 1 CS+ items were also more likely to exhibit three brain effects: first, greater spontaneous reinstatement of the Phase 1 context when participants viewed conceptually-related CS+ items in Phase 2; second, greater successful encoding-related VTA/SN and LC activation for Phase 2 CS+ items; and third, learning-dependent increases in post-encoding hippocampal functional coupling with CS+ category-selective cortex. These biases in hippocampal-cortical connectivity also mediated the relationship between VTA/SN aversive encoding effects and across-participant variability in the retroactive memory benefit. Collectively, our findings suggest that both online and offline brain mechanisms may enable threatening events to preserve memories that acquire new significance in the future.

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationBrainConditioning, ClassicalFearFemaleHippocampusHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAversiveConsolidationDopamineHippocampusMemoryReactivation

Identifiers

PMID34871800
PMCPMC8755594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.