Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871728›Full record

Observational studyThe Canadian journal of cardiology2022

The Utility of Handheld Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients With COVID-19.

Ziv Dadon, Nir Levi, Amir Orlev, Daniel Belman, Evan Avraham Alpert, Michael Glikson, Shmuel Gottlieb, Adi Butnaru

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ziv DadonJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Nir LeviJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amir OrlevJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Daniel BelmanIntensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Evan Avraham AlpertEmergency Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michael GliksonJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shmuel GottliebJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: shmuelg@ekmd.huji.ac.il.
Adi ButnaruJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrict isolation precautions limit formal echocardiography use in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Information on the importance of handheld focused ultrasound for cardiac evaluation in these patients is scarce. This study investigated the utility of a handheld echocardiography device in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in diagnosing cardiac pathologies and predicting the composite end point of in-hospital death, mechanical ventilation, shock, and acute decompensated heart failure.

methodsFrom April 28 through July 27, 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 underwent evaluation with the use of handheld ultrasound (Vscan Extend with Dual Probe; GE Healthcare) within 48 hours of admission. The patients were divided into 2 groups: "normal" and "abnormal" echocardiogram, as defined by biventricular systolic dysfunction/enlargement or moderate/severe valvular regurgitation/stenosis.

resultsAmong 102 patients, 26 (25.5%) had abnormal echocardiograms. They were older with more comorbidities and more severe presenting symptoms compared with the group with normal echocardiograms. The prevalences of the composite outcome among low- and high-risk patients (oxygen saturation < 94%) were 3.1% and 27.1%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an abnormal echocardiogram at presentation was independently associated with the composite end point (odds ratio 6.19, 95% confidence interval 1.50-25.57; P = 0.012).

conclusionsAn abnormal echocardiogram in COVID-19 infection settings is associated with a higher burden of medical comorbidities and independently predicts major adverse end points. Handheld focused echocardiography can be used as an important "rule-out" tool among high-risk patients with COVID-19 and should be integrated into their routine admission evaluation. However, its routine use among low-risk patients is not recommended.

Indexed as

AgedCOVID-19EchocardiographyFemaleHeart DiseasesHospitalizationHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34871728
PMCPMC8641404
OpenAlexW3215520005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.