ArticleNucleic acids research2021
CoCoNet-boosting RNA contact prediction by convolutional neural networks.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of contact map topology on RNA structure prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- AI-integrated network for RNA complex structure and dynamic prediction.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Towards parsimonious generative modeling of RNA families.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- RNA contact prediction by data efficient deep learning.Communications biology · 2023Article
- RNAJP: enhanced RNA 3D structure predictions with non-canonical interactions and global topology sampling.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-evolutionary models such as direct coupling analysis (DCA) in combination with machine learning (ML) techniques based on deep neural networks are able to predict accurate protein contact or distance maps. Such information can be used as constraints in structure prediction and massively increase prediction accuracy. Unfortunately, the same ML methods cannot readily be applied to RNA as they rely on large structural datasets only available for proteins. Here, we demonstrate how the available smaller data for RNA can be used to improve prediction of RNA contact maps. We introduce an algorithm called CoCoNet that is based on a combination of a Coevolutionary model and a shallow Convolutional Neural Network. Despite its simplicity and the small number of trained parameters, the method boosts the positive predictive value (PPV) of predicted contacts by about 70% with respect to DCA as tested by cross-validation of about eighty RNA structures. However, the direct inclusion of the CoCoNet contacts in 3D modeling tools does not result in a proportional increase of the 3D RNA structure prediction accuracy. Therefore, we suggest that the field develops, in addition to contact PPV, metrics which estimate the expected impact for 3D structure modeling tools better. CoCoNet is freely available and can be found at https://github.com/KIT-MBS/coconet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.