Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871411›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Division of labor between SOS and PafBC in mycobacterial DNA repair and mutagenesis.

Oyindamola O Adefisayo, Pierre Dupuy, Astha Nautiyal, James M Bean, Michael S Glickman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disinfectant and antibiotic resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Expression ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Toward better cures forClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. An additional proofreader contributes to DNA replication fidelity in mycobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Structure andmBio · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oyindamola O AdefisayoImmunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Pierre DupuyImmunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Astha NautiyalImmunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10025, USA.
James M BeanImmunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Michael S GlickmanImmunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-5164
Kettering University · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair systems allow microbes to survive in diverse environments that compromise chromosomal integrity. Pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis must contend with the genotoxic host environment, which generates the mutations that underlie antibiotic resistance. Mycobacteria encode the widely distributed SOS pathway, governed by the LexA repressor, but also encode PafBC, a positive regulator of the transcriptional DNA damage response (DDR). Although the transcriptional outputs of these systems have been characterized, their full functional division of labor in survival and mutagenesis is unknown. Here, we specifically ablate the PafBC or SOS pathways, alone and in combination, and test their relative contributions to repair. We find that SOS and PafBC have both distinct and overlapping roles that depend on the type of DNA damage. Most notably, we find that quinolone antibiotics and replication fork perturbation are inducers of the PafBC pathway, and that chromosomal mutagenesis is codependent on PafBC and SOS, through shared regulation of the DnaE2/ImuA/B mutasome. These studies define the complex transcriptional regulatory network of the DDR in mycobacteria and provide new insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlling the genesis of antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis.

Indexed as

MutagenesisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCiprofloxacinDNA DamageDNA RepairGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Regulatory NetworksLexA Repressor ProteinMicrobial ViabilityMycobacterium smegmatisMycobacterium tuberculosisSerine EndopeptidasesSOS Response, GeneticsSpecies SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCiprofloxacinLexA Repressor ProteinSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID34871411
PMCPMC8682763
OpenAlexW4226041328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.