Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871321›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction predicted by artificial intelligence using the electrocardiogram in Chagas disease patients-The SaMi-Trop cohort.

Bruno Oliveira de Figueiredo Brito, Zachi I Attia, Larissa Natany A Martins, Pablo Perel, Maria Carmo P Nunes, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Clareci Silva Cardoso, Ariela Mota Ferreira, Paulo R Gomes, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruno Oliveira de Figueiredo BritoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-006X
Zachi I AttiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Larissa Natany A MartinsTelehealth Center, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2464-6343
Pablo PerelLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2342-301X
Maria Carmo P NunesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ester Cerdeira SabinoInstituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-5126
Clareci Silva CardosoFederal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0689-1644
Ariela Mota FerreiraGraduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2315-5318
Paulo R GomesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-1812
Antonio Luiz Pinho RibeiroFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-0042
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRMayo Clinic · USFederal University of São João del-Rei · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BR

Funding

Sao Paulo-Minas Gerais Tropical Medicine Research Center for Chagas Disease Biomarker DiscoveryU19AI098461 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI PEREIRA, ALEXANDRE DA COSTA · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
"Sao Paulo-Minas Gerais Center for Chagas Disease Treatment (SaMiTrop)"U01AI168383 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI Ester Cerdeira Sabino · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Sao Paulo- MInas Gerais Neglected Tropical Disease Research Center for BiomarkerP50AI098461 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI SABINO, ESTER CERDEIRA · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI098461NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI168383NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI098461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in Chagas disease (ChD) is relatively common and its treatment using low-cost drugs can improve symptoms and reduce mortality. Recently, an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled ECG algorithm showed excellent accuracy to detect LVSD in a general population, but its accuracy in ChD has not been tested.

objectiveTo analyze the ability of AI to recognize LVSD in patients with ChD, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction determined by the Echocardiogram ≤ 40%. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis is a cross-sectional study of ECG obtained from a large cohort of patients with ChD named São Paulo-Minas Gerais Tropical Medicine Research Center (SaMi-Trop) Study. The digital ECGs of the participants were submitted to the analysis of the trained machine to detect LVSD. The diagnostic performance of the AI-enabled ECG to detect LVSD was tested using an echocardiogram as the gold standard to detect LVSD, defined as an ejection fraction <40%. The model was enriched with NT-proBNP plasma levels, male sex, and QRS ≥ 120ms. Among the 1,304 participants of this study, 67% were women, median age of 60; there were 93 (7.1%) individuals with LVSD. Most patients had major ECG abnormalities (59.5%). The AI algorithm identified LVSD among ChD patients with an odds ratio of 63.3 (95% CI 32.3-128.9), a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 83%, an overall accuracy of 83%, and a negative predictive value of 97%; the AUC was 0.839. The model adjusted for the male sex and QRS ≥ 120ms improved the AUC to 0.859. The model adjusted for the male sex and elevated NT-proBNP had a higher accuracy of 0.89 and an AUC of 0.874.

conclusionThe AI analysis of the ECG of Chagas disease patients can be transformed into a powerful tool for the recognition of LVSD.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAgedAlgorithmsBrazilChagas DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID34871321
PMCPMC8675930
OpenAlexW4200566694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.