Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871301›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Assessment of community support for Wolbachia-mediated population suppression as a control method for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in a community cohort in Puerto Rico.

Liliana Sánchez-González, Laura E Adams, Rafael Saavedra, Emma M Little, Nicole A Medina, Chelsea G Major, Marina Bruck, Julieanne Miranda, Coral Rosado-Santiago, Kyle Ryff and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies for controllingCaribbean journal of science · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Arbovirus Prevalence and Vulnerability Assessment Through Entomological Surveillance in Ponce, Puerto Rico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Liliana Sánchez-GonzálezCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-8587
Laura E AdamsCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0003-4698-7720
Rafael SaavedraPuerto Rico Vector Control Unit, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-8110
Emma M LittleCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-3179
Nicole A MedinaCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-1410-6944
Chelsea G MajorCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-5349
Marina BruckEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0227-9768
Julieanne MirandaPuerto Rico Vector Control Unit, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-2179
Coral Rosado-SantiagoCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0003-0968-6240
Kyle RyffCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Marianyoly OrtizPuerto Rico Vector Control Unit, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0003-2546-7435
Grayson BrownPuerto Rico Vector Control Unit, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Roberto BarreraCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Carmen L Pérez-GuerraCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-0155
Vanessa Rivera-AmillPonce Health Sciences University/Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico.
Gabriela Paz-BaileyCDC Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Dengue Branch, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Puerto Rico Department of Health · PREmory University · USPonce Health Sciences University · PR

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000580NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000437NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arboviral diseases transmitted by Aedes species mosquitoes pose an increasing public health challenge in tropical regions. Wolbachia-mediated population suppression (Wolbachia suppression) is a vector control method used to reduce Aedes mosquito populations by introducing male mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia, a naturally occurring endosymbiotic bacterium. When Wolbachia-infected male mosquitoes mate with female wild mosquitoes, the resulting eggs will not hatch. Public support is vital to the successful implementation and sustainability of vector control interventions. Communities Organized to Prevent Arboviruses (COPA) is a cohort study to determine the incidence of arboviral disease in Ponce, Puerto Rico and evaluate vector control methods. Focus groups were conducted with residents of COPA communities to gather their opinion on vector control methods; during 2018-2019, adult COPA participants were interviewed regarding their views on Wolbachia suppression; and a follow-up questionnaire was conducted among a subset of participants and non-participants residing in COPA communities. We analyzed factors associated with support for this method. Among 1,528 participants in the baseline survey, median age was 37 years and 63% were female. A total of 1,032 (68%) respondents supported Wolbachia suppression. Respondents with an income of $40,000 or more were 1.34 times as likely [95% CI: 1.03, 1.37] to support Wolbachia suppression than those who earned less than $40,000 annually. Respondents who reported repellant use were 1.19 times as likely to support Wolbachia suppression [95% CI: 1.03, 1.37]. A follow-up survey in 2020 showed that most COPA participants (86%) and non-participants living in COPA communities (84%) supported Wolbachia suppression during and after an educational campaign. The most frequent questions regarding this method were related to its impact on human and animal health, and the environment. Continuous community engagement and education efforts before and during the implementation of novel vector control interventions are necessary to increase and maintain community support.

Indexed as

AdultAedesAnimalsCohort StudiesCommunity SupportFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsSexual Behavior, AnimalSurveys and QuestionnairesWolbachiaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34871301
PMCPMC8675917
OpenAlexW4200482625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.