Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871292›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 103 Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma Identifies the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Imaging Marker for Tumor Invasion and Regional Lymph Node Involvement.

Jaromir Kargol, Wojciech Rudnicki, Jakub Kenig, Justyna Filipowska, Ewa Kaznowska, Tomasz Kluz, Wiesław Guz, Elżbieta Łuczyńska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaromir KargolInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Wojciech RudnickiDepartment of Electroradiology, Medical College of Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.
Jakub KenigChair of General Surgery, Medical College of Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.
Justyna FilipowskaDepartment of Imaging Diagnostics and Nuclear Medicine, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Ewa KaznowskaDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Tomasz KluzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Wiesław GuzDepartment of Imaging Diagnostics and Nuclear Medicine, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Elżbieta ŁuczyńskaDepartment of Imaging Diagnostics and Nuclear Medicine, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland.
Rzeszów University · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This retrospective study included 103 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma at a single center in Poland who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and aimed to determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was an imaging marker for tumor invasion and regional lymph node involvement. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed primary staging magnetic resonance examinations of the rectum of 103 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-mucinous adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment. In 85 patients, surgery was preceded by long-course chemoradiotherapy (n=18) or short-course radiotherapy (n=67). The following DWI parameters were measured: ADC mean, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation in the region of interest (ADC SD-in-ROI). Values were compared between subgroups based on histological parameters from the report: tumor stage, lymph node stage, differentiation grade, the presence of extranodal tumor deposits, angioinvasion, and perineural invasion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the unilateral t test. RESULTS ADC mean values were lower for cases in which postoperative histopathological examination lymph node invasion (P=0.04) and tumor deposits were found (P=0.04). Minimal ADC value was higher in cases in which tumor deposits were not found (P=0.009). ADC SD-in-ROI values were lower in cases in which lymph nodes invasion was confirmed (P=0.014). There were no statistically significant differences for other parameters. CONCLUSIONS The ADC values in pre-treatment DWI in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were correlated with tumor invasion and regional lymph node metastases. Therefore, ADC values from the pre-treatment MRI may help plan adjuvant therapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRectal NeoplasmsRectumRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34871292
PMCPMC8662961
OpenAlexW3216670208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.