Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34871027›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation psychology2021

Adapting intervention approaches to new contexts: Three case studies of international adaptation of the Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) program.

Shari L Wade, Kelly M Jones, Claudia Corti, Anna R Adlam, Jennifer Limond, Alessandra Bardoni, Lisa M Gies

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07563218 (SYN-TOPS), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07563218 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

SYN-TOPS: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial on the Use of the I-TOPS Intervention to Improve Adaptive Skills in Adolescents and Young Adults With Genetic Syndromes

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled42ConditionsGenetic SyndromeArmsItalian Tailored Online Problem-Solving (I-TOPS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shari L WadeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Kelly M JonesNational Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences.ORCID 0000-0001-5692-653X
Claudia CortiScientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-3182
Anna R AdlamDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-4051
Jennifer LimondDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter.
Alessandra BardoniScientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-3857
Lisa M GiesDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-8996-4281

Funding

Italian Ministry of HealthNational Institute for Health ResearchNational Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation ResearchPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectiveTo describe the process of adapting the evidence-based Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS) program, a telehealth problem-solving treatment addressing executive function and behavior regulation challenges in adolescents with traumatic brain injury, in Italy, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Research Method/Design: We describe the process of adapting and translating the TOPS program in 3 case studies with unique methods and samples. In Italy, 14 parents of adolescents with TBI participated in focus groups, and 2 adolescents with TBI and their parents and 2 physicians provided input on the resulting translation. In New Zealand, an independent Māori cultural advisor reviewed the content, and 6 adolescent-parent dyads and 2 health professionals completed the 10 modules independently over a five-week period to inform adaptation. In the United Kingdom, a team of neuropsychologists and a parent of an adolescent with ABI reviewed and adapted the content through successive iterations.

resultsIn Italy, suggested changes included greater emphasis on nonverbal communication and clearer examples of inappropriate problem-solving responses. In New Zealand, parents and adolescents rated the program as acceptable and helpful. Suggestions included incorporating familiar Māori settings, integrating religion, and developing videos with New Zealand adolescents. In the United Kingdom, iterative refinements focused on adapting TOPS for other acquired brain injuries and reflecting cross-national differences (e.g., drinking age). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These 3 case studies suggest that programs such as TOPS developed in 1 cultural context can be broadly acceptable in other contexts, with adaptations focusing on tailoring to reflect the unique cultural and linguistic setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticAdolescentExecutive FunctionHumansParentsProblem Solving

Identifiers

PMID34871027
PMCPMC7612083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.