Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870818›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Bioinformatics Approaches for Analyzing Multigene Families Encoding Immune Receptors.

Katherine M Buckley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine M BuckleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. kbuckley@auburn.edu.
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome sequences are quickly becoming available from a variety of organisms, providing researchers with an abundance of previously inaccessible information and an important source of insight into immune mechanisms. There are a variety of methods to accurately characterize genes from new genome sequences, but immune receptors pose special challenges for these techniques. Immune receptors, particularly those that directly recognize pathogens, often diverge rapidly among species and are commonly found in large, complex multigene families. Because of these characteristics, immune receptors tend to be overlooked or misannotated in large-scale genomic surveys. We describe here a strategy to characterize homologs of immune receptors and to identify putative receptors from newly assembled genome or transcriptome sequences. The description of these protocols is aimed at a typical immunologist and does not rely on substantial a priori knowledge of bioinformatics. The approach is based on using low-stringency sequence searches to identify divergent homologs. For receptors with multiple domains, the intersection of low-stringency searches can be used to identify divergent receptor sequences with high confidence. For multigene families, these predictions can be refined using sequence conservation among gene family paralogs. Assembled genome sequences serve as a critical foundation for subsequent functional characterization and remove long-standing barriers in understanding the evolution of immune recognition systems.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomeGenomicsHumansMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ImmunologicComparative immunologyGene familyGenome annotationProtein domainTLRs

Identifiers

PMID34870818
OpenAlexW4200455776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.