ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022
Refractive Outcomes for Combined Phacoemulsification and Glaucoma Drainage Procedure.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refractive error after phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in primary angle-closure glaucoma: a multifactorial analysis of biometric parameters and surgical strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma-A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo evaluate the refractive outcome of combined cataract extraction and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery.
methodsPatients who had undergone combined phacoemulsification with GDD surgery [Baerveldt, Abbott Medical, Abbott Park (IL) or Ahmed valve, New World Medical, Rancho Cucamonga (CA)] between June 2009 and August 2017 were included in the study. The main outcome measure evaluated was whether or not spherical equivalent (SE) between ± 1D from target refraction was achieved at 3-6 months postoperatively.
resultsThe final analysis included 42 eyes of 38 patients who underwent combined phacoemulsification and GDD surgery. A refractive outcome of spherical equivalent (SE) between ± 1D of the target refraction was achieved in 30 of 42 eyes (71.43%) at 3-6 months after surgery. Mean preoperative axial length (AL) of eyes with postoperative SE outside ± 1D from target (SD = 0.98, p = 0.003) was noted to be 25.37 ± 0.98 mm (longer mean AL) and that of eyes with SE between ± 1D (SD = 0.89, p = 0.000) was found to be 23.34 ± 0.89 mm (average mean AL). Twelve (29%) eyes were noted to have a mean 0.52D (SD = 0.49; range 0.02-1.49) of corneal astigmatism induced by combined surgery. Age, central corneal thickness, preoperative anterior chamber depth, and pre- and postoperative intraocular pressure did not significantly affect refractive outcomes.
conclusionRefractive outcomes within 1.00D of the target refraction were achieved in most patients undergoing a combined surgical approach. Longer AL was a risk factor among patients with refractive change > 1.00D from target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.