Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870728›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Laxity measurement of internal knee rotation after primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture versus rerupture.

Hermann O Mayr, Georg Hellbruegge, Florian Haasters, Bastian Ipach, Hagen Schmal, Wolf C Prall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Digital measurement of anterolateral knee laxity using strain sensors.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hermann O MayrDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. hermann.mayr@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-0372
Georg HellbrueggeSchoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, Academic Teaching Hospital Munich University, Munich, Germany.
Florian HaastersDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bastian IpachSchoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, Academic Teaching Hospital Munich University, Munich, Germany.
Hagen SchmalDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Wolf C PrallDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the current study was to objectify the rotational laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction by instrumented measurement. It was hypothesized that knees with recurrent instability feature a higher internal rotation laxity as compared to knees with a primary rupture of the native ACL. STUDY

designCross-sectional study, Level of evidence III.

methodsIn a clinical cross-sectional study successive patients with primary ACL rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction were evaluated clinically and by instrumented measurement of the rotational and antero-posterior laxity with a validated instrument and the KT1000

results24 patients with primary ACL rupture and 23 patients with ACL rerupture were included. There was no significant side-to-side difference in anterior translation. A side-to side difference of internal rotational laxity ≥ 10° was found significantly more frequent in reruptures (53.6%) compared to primary ruptures (19.4%; p < 0.001). A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). IKDC 2000 subjective revealed significantly better scores in patients with primary ACL tear compared to patients with ACL rerupture (56.4 ± 7.8 vs. 50.8 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). Patients with primary ACL tears scored significantly better on the Tegner Activity Scale (p = 0.02). No significant differences were seen in the Lysholm Score (p = 0.78).

conclusionPatients with ACL rerupture feature significantly higher internal rotation laxity of the knee compared to primary ACL rupture. The extend of rotational laxity can be quantified by instrumented measurements. This can be valuable data for the indication of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction in ACL revision surgery.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesJoint InstabilityAnterior Cruciate LigamentCross-Sectional StudiesHumansKnee JointRange of Motion, ArticularRuptureACLALLAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterolateral ligamentInstrumented measurementReruptureRotational laxity

Identifiers

PMID34870728
PMCPMC9474331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.