Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870680›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Perceptions of Telehealth vs In-Person Visits Among Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease, Care Partners, and Clinicians.

Keren Ladin, Thalia Porteny, Julia M Perugini, Kristina M Gonzales, Kate E Aufort, Sarah K Levine, John B Wong, Tamara Isakova, Dena Rifkin, Elisa J Gordon and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Keren LadinResearch on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts.
Thalia PortenyResearch on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts.
Julia M PeruginiResearch on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts.
Kristina M GonzalesResearch on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts.
Kate E AufortResearch on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, Massachusetts.
Sarah K LevineWilliam B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
John B WongDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tamara IsakovaCenter for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Dena RifkinDivision of Nephrology, Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Elisa J GordonDepartment of Surgery-Division of Transplantation, and Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, and Center for Bioethics and Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ana RossiPiedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan Koch-WeserDepartment of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Massachusetts.
Daniel E WeinerWilliam B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Mentored patient-oriented research of novel mechanisms for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney diseaseK24HL150235 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ISAKOVA, TAMARA · 2020 to 2024
$582k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL150235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Telehealth has been posited as a cost-effective means for improving access to care for persons with chronic conditions, including kidney disease. Perceptions of telehealth among older patients with chronic illness, their care partners, and clinicians are largely unknown but are critical to successful telehealth use and expansion efforts. Objective: To identify patient, care partner, and nephrologists' perceptions of the patient-centeredness, benefits, drawbacks of telehealth compared to in-person visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews conducted from August to December 2020 with purposively sampled patients (aged 70 years or older, chronic kidney disease stages 4 to 5), care partners, and clinicians in Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Portland, Maine; and San Diego, California. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants described telehealth experiences, including factors contributing to and impeding engagement, satisfaction, and quality of care. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Of 60 interviews, 19 (32%) were with clinicians, 30 (50%) with patients, and 11 (18%) with care partners; 16 clinicians (84%) were nephrologists; 17 patient participants (43%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 38 (67%) were women. Four overarching themes characterized telehealth's benefits and drawbacks for patient-centered care among older, chronically ill adults: inconsistent quality of care, patient experience and engagement, loss of connection and mistrust (eg, challenges discussing bad news), and disparities with accessing telehealth. Although telehealth improved convenience and care partner engagement, participants expressed concerns about clinical effectiveness and limitations of virtual physical examinations and potentially widening disparities in access. Many participants shared concerns about harms to the patient-clinician relationship, limited ability to comfort patients in virtual settings, and reduced patient trust. Conclusions and Relevance: Older patients, care partners, and kidney clinicians (ie, nephrologists and physician assistants) shared divergent views of patient-centered telehealth care, especially its clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and clinician-patient relationship. Understanding older patients' and kidney clinicians' perceptions of telehealth elucidate barriers that should be addressed to promote high-quality care and telehealth use.

Indexed as

AgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversCommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMalePatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceQualitative ResearchTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34870680
PMCPMC8649833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.