Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870593›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Endogenous protein tagging in medaka using a simplified CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in approach.

Ali Seleit, Alexander Aulehla, Alexandre Paix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficient Endogenous Tagging in the Sea Urchin,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Tagging theZebrafish · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic manipulation of betta fish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. CRISPR/Cas9 knockin methodology for the sea urchin embryo.Molecular reproduction and development · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Endogenous tagging of multiple cellular components in the sea anemoneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Genetic manipulation of betta fish.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali SeleitDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8144-2286
Alexander AulehlaDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-9239
Alexandre PaixDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8080-7546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used to generate fluorescently labelled fusion proteins by homology-directed repair in a variety of species. Despite its revolutionary success, there remains an urgent need for increased simplicity and efficiency of genome editing in research organisms. Here, we establish a simplified, highly efficient, and precise strategy for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated endogenous protein tagging in medaka (

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDevelopmental BiologyGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesOryziasProtein TransportCRISPR/Cas9developmental biologyfusion-proteinsHDRknock-insmedakaoryzias latipesPcna

Identifiers

PMID34870593
PMCPMC8691840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.