Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870511›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE

Stakeholders' Perspectives regarding Participation in Neuromodulation-Based Dementia Intervention Research.

Laura B Dunn, Jane P Kim, Maryam Rostami, Sangeeta Mondal, Katie Ryan, Asees Waraich, Laura Weiss Roberts, Barton W Palmer

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura B DunnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5669-6244
Jane P KimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-9822
Maryam RostamiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.
Sangeeta MondalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.
Katie RyanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.
Asees WaraichKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA.
Laura Weiss RobertsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6429Stanford University, USA.
Barton W PalmerPsychology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-3144
Stanford University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Enabling ethical participation in innovative neuroscience on mental illness and addiction: towards a new screening tool enhancing informed consent for transformative research on the human brainR01MH114856 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, LAURA W · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated stakeholders' perspectives regarding participation in two hypothetical neuromodulation trials focused on individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs). Stakeholders (i.e., individuals at risk for ADRDs [

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersCaregiversHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAlzheimer’s diseasecaregiversclinical trialscognitive disordersdecision makingdementianeuromodulationresearch participation

Identifiers

PMID34870511
PMCPMC9631956
OpenAlexW4200368325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.