ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lag-adjusted functional network connectivity reveals sensorimotor and higher cognitive network alterations in depression.Research square · 2026Article
- Ecologically-Valid Emotion Signatures Enhance Mood Disorder Diagnostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Comparing local brain activity and distant functional connectivity in transgender women compared to cisgender controls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Lag-structure in fMRI across Three Psychiatric Groups: State-dependency and Clinical-behavioral Correlates.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Observational
- CLASSIFFICATION OF MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT BASED ON DYNAMIC FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY USING SPATIO-TEMPORAL TRANSFORMER.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- How much is "enough"? Considerations for functional connectivity reliability in pediatric naturalistic fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Aberrant white matter and subcortical gray matter functional network connectivity associated with static and dynamic characteristics in subjects with temporal lobe epilepsy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Anhedonia severity mediates the relationship between attentional networks recruitment and emotional blunting during music listening.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- State-transition dynamics of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data: model comparison and test-to-retest analysis.BMC neuroscience · 2024Article
- Challenges in the measurement and interpretation of dynamic functional connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Adaptive spatial-temporal neural network for ADHD identification using functional fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Temporal Stability of the Dynamic Resting-State Functional Brain Network: Current Measures, Clinical Research Progress, and Future Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Characterizing the spatiotemporal features of functional connectivity across the white matter and gray matter during the naturalistic condition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Mapping the time-varying functional brain networks in response to naturalistic movie stimuli.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The expanding horizons of network neuroscience: From description to prediction and control.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Toward Precise Localization of Abnormal Brain Activity: 1D CNN on Single Voxel fMRI Time-Series.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) has been increasingly used to characterize the brain transient temporal functional patterns and their alterations in diseased brains. Meanwhile, naturalistic neuroimaging paradigms have been an emerging approach for cognitive neuroscience with high ecological validity. However, the test-retest reliability of dFC in naturalistic paradigm neuroimaging is largely unknown. To address this issue, we examined the test-retest reliability of dFC in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under natural viewing condition. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of four dFC statistics including standard deviation (Std), coefficient of variation (COV), amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF), and excursion (Excursion) were used to measure the test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of dFC in naturalistic viewing condition was then compared with that under resting state. Our experimental results showed that: (a) Global test-retest reliability of dFC was much lower than that of static functional connectivity (sFC) in both resting-state and naturalistic viewing conditions; (b) Both global and local (including visual, limbic and default mode networks) test-retest reliability of dFC could be significantly improved in naturalistic viewing condition compared to that in resting state; (c) There existed strong negative correlation between sFC and dFC, weak negative correlation between dFC and dFC-ICC (i.e., ICC of dFC), as well as weak positive correlation between dFC-ICC and sFC-ICC (i.e., ICC of sFC). The present study provides novel evidence for the promotion of naturalistic paradigm fMRI in functional brain network studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.