Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2021

piggyPrime: High-Efficacy Prime Editing in Human Cells Using piggyBac-Based DNA Transposition.

Jonas Holst Wolff, Jakob Haldrup, Emil Aagaard Thomsen, Sofie Andersen, Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Precise genetic engineering withPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Prime editing in hematopoietic stem cells-FromFrontiers in genome editing · 2023
    Review
  9. Current advancement in the application of prime editing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Selecting for CRISPR-Edited Knock-In Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas Holst WolffDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob HaldrupDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Emil Aagaard ThomsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sofie AndersenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jacob Giehm MikkelsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prime editing is a novel genome editing technology that allows a wide range of tailored genomic alterations. Prime editing does not involve homologous recombination, but suffers from low efficacy. Here, we demonstrate piggyPrime, a transfected single-vector system based on piggyBac DNA transposition for genomic integration of all prime editing components in human cells allowing easy and effective transgenesis with prime editing efficacies up to 100% in cell lines.

Indexed as

CRISPRDNA transpositionpegRNApiggyBacprime editingprime editing guide RNA

Identifiers

PMID34870275
PMCPMC8633390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.