ArticleJAAD international2022
Halobetasol propionate lotion 0.05% in patients 12 to 16 years 11 months of age with plaque psoriasis: Results of an open-label study evaluating adrenal suppression potential.
Article in JAAD international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of halobetasol propionate (HBP) lotion 0.05% on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis have not been previously evaluated in adolescents.
objectiveTo examine the effect of HBP on HPA axis suppression in patients aged <17 years with plaque psoriasis.
methodsIn this phase 4, open-label, multicenter study, patients aged 12 to 16 years 11 months with stable plaque psoriasis covering ≥10% of their body surface area were enrolled. The patients applied an HBP lotion twice daily for up to 2 weeks. The cosyntropin stimulation test was used to determine cortisol levels at the time of screening and at the end of the study to evaluate HPA axis response. The additional endpoints included adverse events, disease severity (measured using Investigator Global Assessment score), and percent body surface area affected.
resultsSixteen patients were enrolled and included in the safety population; 14 were included in the evaluable population. One patient exhibited an abnormal HPA axis response (16.2 μg/dL) at the end of the study; the response returned to normal at the 6-month follow-up visit. By the end of the study, the Investigator Global Assessment score improved by ≥1 point in most patients; moreover, the percent body surface area affected decreased from 11.5% to 2.8%. One mild adverse event was possibly related to the HBP lotion; however, it resolved and did not cause study discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size.
conclusionThe HBP lotion 0.05% appeared efficacious and well tolerated in patients as young as 12 years old.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.