ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021
Octree Representation Improves Data Fidelity of Cardiac CT Images and Convolutional Neural Network Semantic Segmentation of Left Atrial and Ventricular Chambers.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning enables fully automated cineCT-based assessment of regional right ventricular function.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Advancements in cardiac structures segmentation: a comprehensive systematic review of deep learning in CT imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- DiFiR-CT: Distance field representation to resolve motion artifacts in computed tomography.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Detection of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities from volume rendering of 4DCT cardiac angiograms using deep learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether octree representation and octree-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) improve segmentation accuracy of three-dimensional images. MATERIALS AND
methodsCardiac CT angiographic examinations from 100 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 17 [standard deviation]; 60 men) performed between June 2012 and June 2018 with semantic segmentations of the left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) blood pools at the end-diastolic and end-systolic cardiac phases were retrospectively evaluated. Image quality (root mean square error [RMSE]) and segmentation fidelity (global Dice and border Dice coefficients) metrics of the octree representation were compared with spatial downsampling for a range of memory footprints. Fivefold cross-validation was used to train an octree-based CNN and CNNs with spatial downsampling at four levels of image compression or spatial downsampling. The semantic segmentation performance of octree-based CNN (OctNet) was compared with the performance of U-Nets with spatial downsampling.
resultsOctrees provided high image and segmentation fidelity (median RMSE, 1.34 HU; LV Dice coefficient, 0.970; LV border Dice coefficient, 0.843) with a reduced memory footprint (87.5% reduction). Spatial downsampling to the same memory footprint had lower data fidelity (median RMSE, 12.96 HU; LV Dice coefficient, 0.852; LV border Dice coefficient, 0.310). OctNet segmentation improved the border segmentation Dice coefficient (LV, 0.612; LA, 0.636) compared with the highest performance among U-Nets with spatial downsampling (Dice coefficients: LV, 0.579; LA, 0.592).
conclusionOctree-based representations can reduce the memory footprint and improve segmentation border accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.