Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870215›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021

Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Victor Dahlblom, Ingvar Andersson, Kristina Lång, Anders Tingberg, Sophia Zackrisson, Magnus Dustler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01091545 (Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01091545 nacompletednot on this map

Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2010 to 2019Enrolled15,000ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDBT and FFDM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: application and future perspectives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor DahlblomDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-5387
Ingvar AnderssonDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5309-4037
Kristina LångDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9250-1897
Anders TingbergDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-0725
Sophia ZackrissonDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-3882
Magnus DustlerDiagnostic Radiology (V.D., I.A., K.L., S.Z., M.D.) and Medical Radiation Physics (A.T., M.D.), Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; and Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology (V.D., S.Z.), Unilabs Breast Centre (I.A., K.L.), and Department of Radiation Physics (A.T.), Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5699-9664
Skåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate how an artificial intelligence (AI) system performs at digital mammography (DM) from a screening population with ground truth defined by digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and whether AI could detect breast cancers at DM that had originally only been detected at DBT. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this secondary analysis of data from a prospective study, DM examinations from 14 768 women (mean age, 57 years), examined with both DM and DBT with independent double reading in the Malmӧ Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01091545; data collection, 2010-2015), were analyzed with an AI system. Of 136 screening-detected cancers, 95 cancers were detected at DM and 41 cancers were detected only at DBT. The system identifies suspicious areas in the image, scored 1-100, and provides a risk score of 1 to 10 for the whole examination. A cancer was defined as AI detected if the cancer lesion was correctly localized and scored at least 62 (threshold determined by the AI system developers), therefore resulting in the highest examination risk score of 10. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and detection performance was analyzed with receiver operating characteristics.

resultsThe highest examination risk score was assigned to 10% (1493 of 14 786) of the examinations. With 90.8% specificity, the AI system detected 75% (71 of 95) of the DM-detected cancers and 44% (18 of 41) of cancers at DM that had originally been detected only at DBT. The majority were invasive cancers (17 of 18).

conclusionAlmost half of the additional DBT-only screening-detected cancers in the MBTST were detected at DM with AI. AI did not reach double reading performance; however, if combined with double reading, AI has the potential to achieve a substantial portion of the benefit of DBT screening.

Indexed as

Application DomainBreastClassificationComputer-aided DiagnosisDiagnosisMammography

Identifiers

PMID34870215
PMCPMC8637235
OpenAlexW3198096452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.