ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021
Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01091545 (Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Algorithms Versus Radiologists in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Foundation models for radiology-the position of the AI for Health Imaging (AI4HI) network.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Enhancing detection of previously missed non-palpable breast carcinomas through artificial intelligence.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Optimizing Artificial Intelligence Thresholds for Mammographic Lesion Detection: A Retrospective Study on Diagnostic Performance and Radiologist-Artificial Intelligence Discordance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of two AI techniques for the detection of new T2/FLAIR lesions in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence as an additional reader in a breast cancer screening program.European radiology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: application and future perspectives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Personalized breast cancer screening with selective addition of digital breast tomosynthesis through artificial intelligence.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Audit of Prior Screening Mammograms of Screen-Detected Cancers: Implications for the Delay in Breast Cancer Detection.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2023Review
- The utilization of artificial intelligence applications to improve breast cancer detection and prognosis.Saudi medical journal · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence Technology in Basketball Training Action Recognition.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate how an artificial intelligence (AI) system performs at digital mammography (DM) from a screening population with ground truth defined by digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and whether AI could detect breast cancers at DM that had originally only been detected at DBT. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this secondary analysis of data from a prospective study, DM examinations from 14 768 women (mean age, 57 years), examined with both DM and DBT with independent double reading in the Malmӧ Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01091545; data collection, 2010-2015), were analyzed with an AI system. Of 136 screening-detected cancers, 95 cancers were detected at DM and 41 cancers were detected only at DBT. The system identifies suspicious areas in the image, scored 1-100, and provides a risk score of 1 to 10 for the whole examination. A cancer was defined as AI detected if the cancer lesion was correctly localized and scored at least 62 (threshold determined by the AI system developers), therefore resulting in the highest examination risk score of 10. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and detection performance was analyzed with receiver operating characteristics.
resultsThe highest examination risk score was assigned to 10% (1493 of 14 786) of the examinations. With 90.8% specificity, the AI system detected 75% (71 of 95) of the DM-detected cancers and 44% (18 of 41) of cancers at DM that had originally been detected only at DBT. The majority were invasive cancers (17 of 18).
conclusionAlmost half of the additional DBT-only screening-detected cancers in the MBTST were detected at DM with AI. AI did not reach double reading performance; however, if combined with double reading, AI has the potential to achieve a substantial portion of the benefit of DBT screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.