Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34870204›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2021

How can social workers be meaningfully involved in palliative care? A scoping review on the prerequisites and how they can be realised in practice.

Brent Taels, Kirsten Hermans, Chantal Van Audenhove, Nadine Boesten, Joachim Cohen, Koen Hermans, Anja Declercq

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bridging care and support: Social services in hospice.Palliative care and social practice · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brent TaelsLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-8305
Kirsten HermansLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Chantal Van AudenhoveLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nadine BoestenLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joachim CohenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Koen HermansLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care is a holistic practice using a multidisciplinary approach in addressing multidimensional needs. Although the social aspects surrounding the end-of-life phase suggest a place for social work in it, the profession is often inadequately involved in daily practice. This contrasts strongly with the potential meaningful contributions of social workers in this field. To date, no comprehensive list of prerequisites for meaningful social work involvement in palliative care exists. This review aims to gain more insight on the prerequisites for meaningful social work involvement in palliative care and how to realise them in practice. It could therefore provide pathways for future intervention development in enhancing the involvement of social workers and maximising their contributions in palliative care. A scoping review methodology was used. A systematic selection of peer-reviewed articles ranged from 2000 to April 2021 - out of the electronic databases Web of Science, Scopus and Pubmed - was conducted. The 170 articles that met the eligibility criteria were analysed for relevant content using open and axial coding processes. The findings are reported according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The nine prerequisites listed in this review concern the level of individual social work capacities and the level of contextual factors structuring social work practices. A majority of articles have, however, focused on the level of individual social work capacities in a rather specialist view on palliative care. Future research should further address the contextual level of social work involvement in the broader practice of death, dying and bereavement.

Indexed as

bereavementdeathdyingend-of-life carehospice careinvolvementpalliative caresocial work

Identifiers

PMID34870204
PMCPMC8637690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.