Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34869939›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2021

Iterative development and pilot testing of an intervention fidelity monitoring plan for the enhanced, electronic health record-facilitated pragmatic clinical trial: Implications for training and protocol integrity.

Linda L Chlan, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Cindy S Tofthagen, Brianne R Hamann, Kendra E Mele, Donna Dozois, Sheryl M Ness, Laura J Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda L ChlanDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jennifer L RidgewayRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, USA.
Cindy S TofthagenDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Brianne R HamannDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kendra E MeleDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Donna DozoisDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sheryl M NessDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Laura J PetersonDivision of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fidelity monitoring is the degree to which a clinical trial intervention is implemented as intended by a research protocol. Consistent implementation of research protocols supported with extant fidelity monitoring plans contribute rigor and validity of study results. Fidelity monitoring plans should be comprehensive yet practical to accommodate the realities of conducting research, particularly a pragmatic clinical trial, in dynamic settings with heterogeneous patient populations. The purposes of this paper are to describe the (1) iterative development and implementation of protocols for intervention fidelity monitoring, (2) pilot testing of the fidelity monitoring plan, (3) the identification of interventionist training deficiencies, and (4) opportunities to enhance protocol rigor for a cancer symptom management intervention delivered through the electronic health record patient portal and telephone as part of a complex, multi-component pragmatic clinical trial to uncover training deficits and bolster protocol integrity. The intervention focuses on prominent symptoms reported among medical oncology patients including sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, low energy (fatigue) and physical function. In this pragmatic trial, the role of interventionist is a registered nurse symptom care manager (RN SCM). A three-part fidelity monitoring plan with checklists audit: Part-1 RN SCM role training activities in research components, clinical training components, and protocol simulation training; Part-2 RN SCM adherence to the intervention core components delivered over the telephone; and Part-3 maintenance of adherence to core intervention components. The goal is ≥ 80% adherence to components of each of the three checklists. An initial pilot test of the fidelity monitoring plan was conducted to evaluate the checklists and the RN SCM adherence to core protocol components. RN SCM skills and training deficits were identified during the pilot phase, as were opportunities to improve protocol integrity. Overall, approximately 50% of the audited RN SCM telephone calls had ≥80% fidelity to the core components. There remains on-going need for RN SCM training and skill building in action planning. The content presented in this paper is intended to begin to fill the gap of fidelity monitoring plans for complex interventions tested in pragmatic clinical trials and delivered remotely in an effort to strengthen protocol integrity.

Indexed as

E2C2, Enhanced Electronic Health Record-facilitated Cancer Symptom ControlEHR, Electronic health recordElectronic health recordIntervention fidelity monitoringNursePatient-reported outcome measureRN, Registered NurseSCM, Symptom Care ManagerSelf-managementSMART, Specific-Measurable-Achievable-Relevant-Time limitedSPADE, Sleep disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Energy (fatigue)Symptom management

Identifiers

PMID34869939
PMCPMC8617340
OpenAlexW3215900315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.