Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34869936›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational social science2022

An inclusive, real-world investigation of persuasion in language and verbal behavior.

Vivian P Ta, Ryan L Boyd, Sarah Seraj, Anne Keller, Caroline Griffith, Alexia Loggarakis, Lael Medema

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational social science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivian P TaDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, 555 N. Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-335X
Ryan L BoydDepartment of Psychology, Data Science Institute, Security Lancaster, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6050
Sarah SerajDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-5887
Anne KellerDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, 555 N. Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA.
Caroline GriffithDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, 555 N. Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-0678
Alexia LoggarakisDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, 555 N. Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-671X
Lael MedemaDepartment of Psychology, Lake Forest College, 555 N. Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045 USA.
Lake Forest College · USLancaster University · GBThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Dayton · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linguistic features of a message necessarily shape its persuasive appeal. However, studies have largely examined the effect of linguistic features on persuasion in isolation and do not incorporate properties of language that are often involved in real-world persuasion. As such, little is known about the key verbal dimensions of persuasion or the relative impact of linguistic features on a message's persuasive appeal in real-world social interactions. We collected large-scale data of online social interactions from a social media website in which users engage in debates in an attempt to change each other's views on any topic. Messages that successfully changed a user's views are explicitly marked by the user themselves. We simultaneously examined linguistic features that have been previously linked with message persuasiveness between persuasive and non-persuasive messages. Linguistic features that drive persuasion fell along three central dimensions: structural complexity, negative emotionality, and positive emotionality. Word count, lexical diversity, reading difficulty, analytical language, and self-references emerged as most essential to a message's persuasive appeal: messages that were longer, more analytic, less anecdotal, more difficult to read, and less lexically varied had significantly greater odds of being persuasive. These results provide a more parsimonious understanding of the social psychological pathways to persuasion as it operates in the real world through verbal behavior. Our results inform theories that address the role of language in persuasion, and provide insight into effective persuasion in digital environments.

Indexed as

Attitude changeLanguageOnline interactionsPersuasion

Identifiers

PMID34869936
PMCPMC8633087
OpenAlexW3212821709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.