Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34869713›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Intraoperative Ultrasound Applications in Intracranial Surgery.

Andy Shores, Alison M Lee, S T Kornberg, Chris Tollefson, Marc A Seitz, R W Wills, Michaela J Beasley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andy ShoresDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Alison M LeeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
S T KornbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Chris TollefsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Marc A SeitzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
R W WillsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Michaela J BeasleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State, MS, United States.
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methods and use of intraoperative ultrasound in 33 canine and five feline patients and its ability to localize and identify anatomical structures and pathological lesions in canines and felines undergoing intracranial surgery are described from a case series. All were client-owned referral patients admitted for neurologic evaluation, with an advanced imaging diagnosis of an intracranial lesion, and underwent surgical biopsy or surgical removal of the lesion. Medical records, retrieval and review of imaging reports, and characterization of findings for all canine and feline patients show that intraoperative ultrasound guidance was used in intracranial procedures during the period of 2012 and 2019. Twenty-nine of the canine patients had intracranial tumors. The remainder had various other conditions requiring intracranial intervention. Three of the feline patients had meningiomas, one had a depressed skull fracture, and one had an epidural hematoma. The tumors appeared hyperechoic on intraoperative ultrasound with the exception of cystic portions of the masses and correlated with the size and location seen on advanced imaging. Statistical comparison of the size of images seen on ultrasound and on MRI for 20 of the canine tumors revealed no statistical differences. Neuroanatomical structures, including vascular components, were easily identified, and tumor images correlated well with preoperative advanced imaging. The authors conclude that intraoperative ultrasound is a valuable asset in intracranial mass removals and can augment surgical guidance in a variety of intracranial disorders that require surgery. This is the first known publication in veterinary surgery of using intraoperative ultrasound as a tool in the operating theater to identify, localize, and monitor the removal/biopsy of intracranial lesions in small animals undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy.

Indexed as

craniectomycraniotomyintraoperative ultrasoundreal-time imagingveterinary

Identifiers

PMID34869713
PMCPMC8635011
OpenAlexW3212821921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.