Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34869613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021

10 Years of Human-NAO Interaction Research: A Scoping Review.

Aida Amirova, Nazerke Rakhymbayeva, Elmira Yadollahi, Anara Sandygulova, Wafa Johal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06948227 (Effect Of Social Robots On Motivation And Participation In Activities Of Daily Life Training In Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06948227 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect Of Social Robots On Motivation And Participation In Activities Of Daily Life Training In Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsCerebral Palsy (CP)ArmsDaily Living Activities (ADL) Training Program, Social Robot Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Selecting optimal wearables for measuring physiological arousal in robot-delivered mindfulness-based exercises.Advanced robotics : the international journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Envisioning social drones in education.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aida AmirovaGraduate School of Education, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Nazerke RakhymbayevaDepartment of Robotics and Mechatronics, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Elmira YadollahiÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anara SandygulovaDepartment of Robotics and Mechatronics, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Wafa JohalUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolving field of human-robot interaction (HRI) necessitates that we better understand how social robots operate and interact with humans. This scoping review provides an overview of about 300 research works focusing on the use of the NAO robot from 2010 to 2020. This study presents one of the most extensive and inclusive pieces of evidence on the deployment of the humanoid NAO robot and its global reach. Unlike most reviews, we provide both qualitative and quantitative results regarding how NAO is being used and what has been achieved so far. We analyzed a wide range of theoretical, empirical, and technical contributions that provide multidimensional insights, such as general trends in terms of application, the robot capabilities, its input and output modalities of communication, and the human-robot interaction experiments that featured NAO (e.g. number and roles of participants, design, and the length of interaction). Lastly, we derive from the review some research gaps in current state-of-the-art and provide suggestions for the design of the next generation of social robots.

Indexed as

humanoid robothuman-robot interactionnaoqualitativequantitativereviewsocial robotsurvey

Identifiers

PMID34869613
PMCPMC8640132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.