SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2021
Stakeholder Engagement in Competency Framework Development in Health Professions: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does patient and public involvement influence the development of competency frameworks for the health professions? A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Programmatic assessment in undergraduate diagnostic radiography education: a conceptual framework informed by the Australian context.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Actively engaging multi-level stakeholders in cancer screening and cancer-related studies: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Relational Agency and Ethical Professionalism Among Long-Term Care Workers: Evidence from Taiwan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Competency Goals in Midwifery Master's Programs in Germany and Selected OECD Countries: Comparison of Stakeholder Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Co-designing a national quality and patient safety competency framework for Ireland: insights from a qualitative exploratory study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- An Integrative Review of Specialised Nursing Career Frameworks to Develop a Nursing Career Framework for Registered Nurses Working in Aged Care.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- Patient perspectives on physician competence: Validation of the CanMEDS framework.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Integrating genomics into Canadian oncology nursing policy: Insights from a comparative policy analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2024Article
- Article
- Identifying Features of a System of Practice to Inform a Contemporary Competency Framework for Paramedics in Canada.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Questions to promote child-centered care in racially discordant interactions in pediatric oncology.Patient education and counseling · 2024Article
- Establishing consensus on nutrition competencies for medicine: a Delphi study.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2024Article
- Education of the public health workforce and the Sustainable Development Goals: An analysis of existing competency sets.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competency framework development in health professions has downstream implications for all relevant stakeholders, from the professionals themselves, to organisations, and most importantly end users of services. However, there is little guidance related to what stakeholders might be involved in the competency development process, and when. This review aimed to systematically review literature related to competency framework development methodology in health, to identify the breadth and purpose of key stakeholders commonly involved in the process. Studies were identified using five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC) and a search of websites of organisations involved in curriculum or regulation using keywords related to competency frameworks. The total yield from all databases was 10,625 results, with 73 articles included in the final review. Most articles were from Australia (30%) and were conducted in the nursing (34%) profession. Unsurprisingly, practitioners (86%) and academics (75%) were typically engaged as stakeholders in competency framework development. While many competency frameworks were described as patient-focused, only 14 (19%) studies elected to include service users as stakeholders. Similarly, despite the multi-disciplinary focus described in some frameworks, only nine (12%) studies involved practitioners from other professions. Limiting the conceptualisation of competence to that determined by members of the profession itself may not provide the depth of insight required to capture the complexity of healthcare and address the needs of important stakeholder groups. Future methodology should attempt to engage a variety of relevant stakeholders such as external health professions and the community to match professional education to health service demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.