ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2021
Surface Treatment and Bioinspired Coating for 3D-Printed Implants.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Poly-ε-Caprolactone Implant Performance: Synergistic Surface Modifications With Osteon-Like Microstructure, Cold Atmospheric Plasma, and Extracellular Matrix Coating.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Antifouling Coatings Inspired by Biological Templates.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Review
- 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Review
- Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2023Review
- Functional engineering strategies of 3D printed implants for hard tissue replacement.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- Enhancing antioxidant delivery through 3D printing: a pathway to advanced therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Effect of micro-arc oxidation surface modification of 3D-printed porous titanium alloys on biological properties.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Laser Direct Writing of Dual-Scale 3D Structures for Cell Repelling at High Cellular Density.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Trace Element-Augmented Titanium Implant With Targeted Angiogenesis and Enhanced Osseointegration in Osteoporotic Rats.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Metal-based nano-delivery platform for treating bone disease and regeneration.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has developed rapidly and demonstrates great potential in biomedical applications. Although 3D printing techniques have good control over the macrostructure of metallic implants, the surface properties have superior control over the tissue response. By focusing on the types of surface treatments, the osseointegration activity of the bone-implant interface is enhanced. Therefore, this review paper aims to discuss the surface functionalities of metallic implants regarding their physical structure, chemical composition, and biological reaction through surface treatment and bioactive coating. The perspective on the current challenges and future directions for development of surface treatment on 3D-printed implants is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.