Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868928›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Prognosis for Cutaneous Melanoma by Clinical and Pathological Profile: A Population-Based Study.

Alessandra Buja, Andrea Bardin, Giovanni Damiani, Manuel Zorzi, Chiara De Toni, Riccardo Fusinato, Romina Spina, Antonella Vecchiato, Paolo Del Fiore, Simone Mocellin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review on radiomic analysis inCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alessandra BujaDepartment of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Andrea BardinDepartment of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni DamianiClinical Dermatology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Manuel ZorziVeneto Tumor Registry - Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy.
Chiara De ToniDepartment of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Riccardo FusinatoDepartment of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Romina SpinaSurgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
Antonella VecchiatoSurgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
Paolo Del FioreSurgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
Simone MocellinSurgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padova, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Massimo RuggeVeneto Tumor Registry - Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy.
Carlo Riccardo RossiDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong white people, the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) has been increasing steadily for several decades. Meanwhile, there has also been a significant improvement in 5-year survival among patients with melanoma. This population-based cohort study investigates the five-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) for all melanoma cases recorded in 2015 in the Veneto Tumor Registry (North-Est Italian Region), taking both demographic and clinical-pathological variables into consideration.

methodsThe cumulative melanoma-specific survival probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, applying different sociodemographic and clinical-pathological variables. Cox's proportional hazards model was fitted to the data to assess the association between independent variables and MSS, and also overall survival (OS), calculating the hazard ratios (HR) relative to a reference condition, and adjusting for sex, age, site of tumor, histotype, melanoma ulceration, mitotic count, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and stage at diagnosis.

resultsCompared with stage I melanoma, the risk of death was increased for stage II (HR 3.31, 95% CI: 0.94-11.76, p=0.064), almost ten times higher for stage III (HR 10.51, 95% CI: 3.16-35.02, p<0.001), and more than a hundred times higher for stage IV (HR 117.17, 95% CI: 25.30-542.62, p<0.001). Among the other variables included in the model, the presence of mitoses and histological subtype emerged as independent risk factors for death.

conclusionsThe multivariable analysis disclosed that older age, tumor site, histotype, mitotic count, and tumor stage were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Data on survival by clinical and morphological characteristics could be useful in modelling, planning, and managing the most appropriate treatment and follow-up for patients with CMM.

Indexed as

cancer survivalclinical characteristicsepidemiologymelanomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID34868928
PMCPMC8634953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.