Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868821›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2021

The Treatment of LGBTQ+ Individuals in Behavior-Analytic Publications: A Historical Review.

Cody Morris, Dana B Goetz, Kaitlin Gabriele-Black

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Scaling Compassion and Applications in ABA.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Teaching the History of Applied Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cody MorrisDepartment of Psychology, Salve Regina University, 144 Metro Center Blvd., Warwick, RI 02886 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-4280
Dana B GoetzDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-672X
Kaitlin Gabriele-BlackDepartment of Psychology, Salve Regina University, 144 Metro Center Blvd., Warwick, RI 02886 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7553-6297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review behavior-analytic publications to understand the field's history of including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ+) individuals in research publications. Twelve articles met the inclusionary criteria for review. The results of the review suggested that the representation of LGBTQ+ individuals is lacking in behavior-analytic literature. Of the 12 articles identified, two were categorized as experimental, three as commentaries, three as survey research, two as conceptual, and two as calls to action. The most prominent period for related publications was between 1973 and 1977, with long periods between other articles that were published in 1990, 1996, 2018, and 2019. Experiments published in the 1970s were associated with conversion therapy, to attempt to change an individual's sexual or gender identity. However, other behavior analysts in the 1970s opposed these experiments. Since these early experiments, there have been no other interventions targeted at affecting the lives of gender and sexual minorities. Behavior analysts must address issues of significance faced by LGBTQ+ individuals through increasing affirming practices, reducing health disparities, increasing safety in schools, and more.

Indexed as

GenderHistoryLGBTQ+Sexual

Identifiers

PMID34868821
PMCPMC8586111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.