ArticleCureus2021
A Prospective Review of Preoperative Nutritional Status and Its Influence on the Outcome of Abdominal Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative nutritional status as a predictor of postoperative overall survival in abdominal tumor surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Postoperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head malignancy in patients over 85 years of age: A safety evaluation using propensity score matching.Surgery today · 2026Article
- General Principles of Risk Mitigation before Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- Predictive value of various nutritional assessment scores for Short-term outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery: A prospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Survival in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection for Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Nutritional Optimization of the Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Peri-Operative Risk Assessment and Management of Geriatric Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of the Noble and Underwood Score in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Surgical Resection.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Role of specific nutritional biomarkers in predicting post-operative complications among patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparison of the Clinical Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index as Determinants of Survival Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim To assess the incidence of malnutrition in a surgical gastroenterology unit and analyze its impact on postoperative complication rates. Method Data were prospectively accrued from patients admitted for emergency or elective surgery to the gastrointestinal surgery unit at Jaslok Hospital between May 2013 and May 2014. The nutritional status was preoperatively assessed by using anthropometric parameters like body mass index (BMI), midarm circumference (MAC), and tissue skinfold thickness (TSFT). In addition, a subjective global assessment scale (SGA), serum albumin, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) were used. Patients with BMI <18.5, MAC <24 cm in males and <22 cm in females, and TSFT <10 mm were considered malnourished. Patients with serum albumin between 3 and 3.5 g/dl were considered mild, 2.4-2.9 g/dl was moderate, and <2.4 g/dl were severely malnourished. Patients with ALC between 1200 and 2000/cm were labelled mild, between 800 and 1199/cm were moderate, and <800/cm were severely malnourished. As per SGA, well-nourished had less than 5% weight loss or if more than 5%, with recent gain and improved appetite, mild/moderately malnourished had 5% to 10% weight loss with no gain, mild subcutaneous fat loss, and those severely malnourished had more than 10% weight loss, severe subcutaneous fat loss, and muscle wasting. Postoperative complications were graded as per the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients with grades 1 and 2 complications were labelled as minor and the rest as major. Result Men in the age group of 40-60 years comprised the majority of the study population. The most frequent reason for admission was cholelithiasis. The overall incidence of malnutrition was 22.16%. Out of the 96 patients who had complications, 45 had minor and 41 had significant complications. Amongst the well-nourished, the incidence of complications was 26.62% of which the majority were minor complications. Severely malnourished patients had a high complication rate (63.38%); 32% out of the 63.38% developed significant complications. The majority of the patients suffering from severe malnutrition belonged to the sub-group with chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma of the pancreas. According to the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.