Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868620›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Does addition of craving management tools in a stop smoking app improve quit rates among adult smokers? Results from BupaQuit pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial.

Aleksandra Herbec, Lion Shahab, Jamie Brown, Harveen Kaur Ubhi, Emma Beard, Alexandru Matei, Robert West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleksandra HerbecDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-7214
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
Harveen Kaur UbhiDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
Emma BeardDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.
Alexandru MateiBupa Centre Medical, UK.
Robert WestDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/59/30649Cancer Research UK 22962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDelivery of craving management tools via smartphone applications (apps) may improve smoking cessation rates, but research on such programmes remains limited, especially in real-world settings. This study evaluated the effectiveness of adding craving management tools in a cessation app (BupaQuit).

methodsThe study was a two-arm pragmatic pilot parallel randomised controlled trial, comparing a fully-automated BupaQuit app with craving management tool with a control app version without craving management tool. A total of 425 adult UK-based daily smokers were enrolled through open online recruitment (February 2015-March 2016), with no researcher involvement, and individually randomised within the app to the intervention (

resultsRe-contact rates were 50.4% at 4 weeks and 40.2% at 6 months. There was no significant difference between intervention and control arms on the primary outcome (13.5% vs 15.7%;

conclusionsThe addition of craving management tools did not affect cessation, and the limited engagement with the app may have contributed to this.

Indexed as

cessationcravingsrandomised controlled trialsmartphonesmoking

Identifiers

PMID34868620
PMCPMC8637712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.