Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868618›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Automatic extraction of 12 cardiovascular concepts from German discharge letters using pre-trained language models.

Phillip Richter-Pechanski, Nicolas A Geis, Christina Kiriakou, Dominic M Schwab, Christoph Dieterich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phillip Richter-PechanskiSection of Bioinformatics and Systems Cardiology, Klaus Tschira Institute for Integrative Computational Cardiology, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-373X
Nicolas A GeisDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christina KiriakouDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dominic M SchwabDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph DieterichSection of Bioinformatics and Systems Cardiology, Klaus Tschira Institute for Integrative Computational Cardiology, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA vast amount of medical data is still stored in unstructured text documents. We present an automated method of information extraction from German unstructured clinical routine data from the cardiology domain enabling their usage in state-of-the-art data-driven deep learning projects.

methodsWe evaluated pre-trained language models to extract a set of 12 cardiovascular concepts in German discharge letters. We compared three bidirectional encoder representations from transformers pre-trained on different corpora and fine-tuned them on the task of cardiovascular concept extraction using 204 discharge letters manually annotated by cardiologists at the University Hospital Heidelberg. We compared our results with traditional machine learning methods based on a long short-term memory network and a conditional random field.

resultsOur best performing model, based on publicly available German pre-trained bidirectional encoder representations from the transformer model, achieved a token-wise micro-average F1-score of 86% and outperformed the baseline by at least 6%. Moreover, this approach achieved the best trade-off between precision (positive predictive value) and recall (sensitivity).

conclusionOur results show the applicability of state-of-the-art deep learning methods using pre-trained language models for the task of cardiovascular concept extraction using limited training data. This minimizes annotation efforts, which are currently the bottleneck of any application of data-driven deep learning projects in the clinical domain for German and many other European languages.

Indexed as

bidirectional encoder representations from transformerDeep learningfine-tuningmedical information extractionnatural language processingpre-trained language models

Identifiers

PMID34868618
PMCPMC8637713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.