ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Diagnostic Value of Deep Learning-Based CT Feature for Severe Pulmonary Infection.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Paediatric Tuberculosis.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of computed tomography images under deep learning in the diagnosis of severe pulmonary infection.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Adoption value of support vector machine algorithm-based computed tomography imaging in the diagnosis of secondary pulmonary fungal infections in patients with malignant hematological disorders.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) images based on cavity convolution U-Net algorithm for patients with severe pulmonary infection. A new lung CT image segmentation algorithm (U-Net+ deep convolution (DC)) was proposed based on U-Net network and compared with convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm. Then, it was applied to CT image diagnosis of 100 patients with severe lung infection in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University hospital and compared with traditional methods, and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. It was found that the single training time and loss of U-Net + DC algorithm were reduced by 59.4% and 9.8%, respectively, compared with CNN algorithm, while Dice increased by 3.6%. The lung contour segmented by the proposed model was smooth, which was the closest to the gold standard. Fungal infection, bacterial infection, viral infection, tuberculosis infection, and mixed infection accounted for 28%, 18%, 7%, 7%, and 40%, respectively. 36%, 38%, 26%, 17%, and 20% of the patients had ground-glass shadow, solid shadow, nodule or mass shadow, reticular or linear shadow, and hollow shadow in CT, respectively. The incidence of various CT characteristics in patients with fungal and bacterial infections was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.