Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868521›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Diagnostic Value of Deep Learning-Based CT Feature for Severe Pulmonary Infection.

Tinglong Huang, Xuelan Zheng, Lisui He, Zhiliang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tinglong HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2978-5633
Xuelan ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8071-3363
Lisui HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6990-6244
Zhiliang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5575-0501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) images based on cavity convolution U-Net algorithm for patients with severe pulmonary infection. A new lung CT image segmentation algorithm (U-Net+ deep convolution (DC)) was proposed based on U-Net network and compared with convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm. Then, it was applied to CT image diagnosis of 100 patients with severe lung infection in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University hospital and compared with traditional methods, and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. It was found that the single training time and loss of U-Net + DC algorithm were reduced by 59.4% and 9.8%, respectively, compared with CNN algorithm, while Dice increased by 3.6%. The lung contour segmented by the proposed model was smooth, which was the closest to the gold standard. Fungal infection, bacterial infection, viral infection, tuberculosis infection, and mixed infection accounted for 28%, 18%, 7%, 7%, and 40%, respectively. 36%, 38%, 26%, 17%, and 20% of the patients had ground-glass shadow, solid shadow, nodule or mass shadow, reticular or linear shadow, and hollow shadow in CT, respectively. The incidence of various CT characteristics in patients with fungal and bacterial infections was statistically significant (

Indexed as

Deep LearningPneumoniaHumansLungThoraxTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34868521
PMCPMC8641994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.