ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Analysis of Ultrasonic Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Pregnancy Complicated with Brain Tumor.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Cureus · 2023Review
- Retracted: Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Analysis of Ultrasonic Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Pregnancy Complicated with Brain Tumor.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Survey on the Detection, Classification, and Challenges of Neurological Disorders.Biology · 2022Review
- Three-Dimensional Skin CT Based on Intelligent Algorithm in the Analysis of Skin Lesion Sites Features in Children with Psoriasis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Observational
- Ultrasound of Fetal Cardiac Function Changes in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension Syndrome.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research was to explore the accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis based on artificial intelligence algorithm in the diagnosis of pregnancy complicated with brain tumors. In this study, 18 patients with pregnancy complicated with brain tumor confirmed by pathology were selected as the research object. Ultrasound contrast based on artificial bee colony algorithm was performed and diagnosed by experienced clinicians. Ultrasonic image will be reconstructed by artificial bee colony algorithm to improve its image display ability. The pathological diagnosis will be handed over to the physiological pathology laboratory of the hospital for diagnosis. The doctor's ultrasonic diagnosis results were compared with the pathological diagnosis stage results of patients, and the results were analyzed by statistical analysis to evaluate its diagnostic value. The comparison results showed that the number and classification of benign tumors were the same, while in malignant tumors, the number diagnosis was the same, but there was one patient with diagnostic error in classification. One case of mixed glial neuron tumor was diagnosed as glial neuron tumor, and the diagnostic accuracy was 94.44% and the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.