Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868498›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2021

Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Different Perspective.

Rajesh Malhotra, Saurabh Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Vikrant Manhas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajesh MalhotraDepartment of Orthopedics, Teaching Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-003X
Saurabh GuptaDepartment of Orthopedics, Teaching Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-3572
Vivek GuptaDepartment of Community Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-3705
Vikrant ManhasDepartment of Orthopedics, Teaching Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-5373
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroudAnteromedial osteoarthritis is a recognized indication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Favorable postoperative outcomes largely depend on proper patient selection, correct implant positioning, and limb alignment. Computer navigation has a proven value over conventional systems in reducing mechanical errors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the lack of strong evidence impedes the universal use of computer navigation technology in UKA. Therefore, this study was proposed to investigate the accuracy of component positioning and limb alignment in computer navigated UKA and to observe the role of navigation in proper patient selection.

methodsA total of 50 knees (38 patients) underwent computer navigated UKA between 2016 and 2018. All operations were performed by the senior surgeon using the same navigation system and implant type. The navigation system was used as a tool to aid patient selection: knees with preoperative residual varus > 5° on valgus stress and hyperextension > 10° were switched to navigated TKA. We measured the accuracy of component placement in sagittal and coronal planes on postoperative radiographs. Functional outcomes were also evaluated at the final follow-up (a minimum of 16 months).

resultsNine patients had tibia vara and 14 patients had preoperative hyperextension deformity. We observed coronal outliers for the tibial component in 12% knees and for the femoral component in 10% knees. We also observed sagittal outliers for the tibial component in 14% knees and for the femoral component in 6% knees. There was a significant improvement in the functional score at the final follow-up. On multiple linear regression, no difference was found in functional scores of knees with or without tibia vara (

conclusionsOur study further validates the role of computer navigation in desirable implant positioning and limb alignment. We encourage use of computer-assisted navigation as a tool for patient selection, as it allows intraoperative dynamic goniometry and provides real-time kinematic behavior of the knee to obviate pitfalls such as significant residual varus angulation and hyperextension that predispose early failure of UKA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansKnee JointRetrospective StudiesTibiaAnteromedial osteoarthritisComputer assisted surgeryKneeOsteoarthritisUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34868498
PMCPMC8609217
OpenAlexW3159246777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.