Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868353›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021

Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects.

María Gion, José Manuel Pérez-García, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Javier Cortés, Andrea Malfettone

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Data Challenges for Externally Controlled Trials: Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Narrative review on the role of immunotherapy in early triple negative breast cancer: unveiling opportunities and overcoming challenges.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María GionUniversity Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Pérez-GarcíaInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Llombart-CussacHospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Miguel Sampayo-CorderoMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Carrer de Vilana, 12, 08022 Barcelona, SpainVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-1583
Andrea MalfettoneMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
MedSIR (Spain) · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESValencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug approval for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) has been historically granted in the context of registration trials based on adequate outcomes such as disease-free survival and overall survival. Improvements in long-term outcomes have made it more difficult to demonstrate the clinical benefit of a new cancer drug in large, randomized, comparative clinical trials. Therefore, the use of surrogate endpoints rather than traditional measures allows for cancer drug trials to proceed with smaller sample sizes and shorter follow-up periods, which reduces drug development time. Among surrogate endpoints for breast cancer, the increase in pathological complete response (pCR) rates was considered appropriate for accelerated drug approval. The association between pCR and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with aggressive tumor subtypes, such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive/hormone receptor-negative breast cancers. Whereas in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative EBC, the most accepted surrogate markers for endocrine therapy-based trials include changes in Ki67 and the preoperative endocrine prognostic index. Beyond the classic endpoints, further prognostic tools are required to provide EBC patients with individualized and effective therapies, and the neoadjuvant setting provides an excellent platform for drug development and biomarker discovery. Nowadays, the availability of multigene signatures is offering a standardized quantitative and reproducible tool to potentiate the efficacy of standard treatment for high-risk patients and develop de-escalated treatments for patients at lower risk of relapse. In this article, we first evaluate the surrogacies used for long-term outcomes and the underlying evidence supporting the use of each surrogate endpoint for the accelerated or regular drug approval process in EBC. Next, we provide an overview of the most recent studies and innovative strategies in a (neo)adjuvant setting as a platform to accelerate new drug approval. Finally, we highlight some clinical trials aimed at tailoring systemic treatment of EBC using prognosis-related factors or early biomarkers of drug sensitivity or resistance.

Indexed as

breast cancer subtypesearly breast cancerintermediate endpointsneoadjuvant therapypathological complete responsesurrogate markers

Identifiers

PMID34868353
PMCPMC8640314
OpenAlexW3216619403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.