Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868291›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

A Novel Rank Aggregation-Based Hybrid Multifilter Wrapper Feature Selection Method in Software Defect Prediction.

Abdullateef O Balogun, Shuib Basri, Saipunidzam Mahamad, Luiz Fernando Capretz, Abdullahi Abubakar Imam, Malek A Almomani, Victor E Adeyemo, Ganesh Kumar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Abdullateef O BalogunDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-3639
Shuib BasriDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-4834
Saipunidzam MahamadDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-4363
Luiz Fernando CapretzDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B9.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-2369
Abdullahi Abubakar ImamDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-1109
Malek A AlmomaniDepartment of Software Engineering, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Amman 11947, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-9792
Victor E AdeyemoSchool of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-3609
Ganesh KumarDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-0948
Universiti Teknologi Petronas · MYLeeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Ilorin · NGWestern University · CAWorld Islamic Sciences and Education University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high dimensionality of software metric features has long been noted as a data quality problem that affects the performance of software defect prediction (SDP) models. This drawback makes it necessary to apply feature selection (FS) algorithm(s) in SDP processes. FS approaches can be categorized into three types, namely, filter FS (FFS), wrapper FS (WFS), and hybrid FS (HFS). HFS has been established as superior because it combines the strength of both FFS and WFS methods. However, selecting the most appropriate FFS (filter rank selection problem) for HFS is a challenge because the performance of FFS methods depends on the choice of datasets and classifiers. In addition, the local optima stagnation and high computational costs of WFS due to large search spaces are inherited by the HFS method. Therefore, as a solution, this study proposes a novel rank aggregation-based hybrid multifilter wrapper feature selection (RAHMFWFS) method for the selection of relevant and irredundant features from software defect datasets. The proposed RAHMFWFS is divided into two stepwise stages. The first stage involves a rank aggregation-based multifilter feature selection (RMFFS) method that addresses the filter rank selection problem by aggregating individual rank lists from multiple filter methods, using a novel rank aggregation method to generate a single, robust, and non-disjoint rank list. In the second stage, the aggregated ranked features are further preprocessed by an enhanced wrapper feature selection (EWFS) method based on a dynamic reranking strategy that is used to guide the feature subset selection process of the HFS method. This, in turn, reduces the number of evaluation cycles while amplifying or maintaining its prediction performance. The feasibility of the proposed RAHMFWFS was demonstrated on benchmarked software defect datasets with Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree classifiers, based on accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), and F-measure values. The experimental results showed the effectiveness of RAHMFWFS in addressing filter rank selection and local optima stagnation problems in HFS, as well as the ability to select optimal features from SDP datasets while maintaining or enhancing the performance of SDP models. To conclude, the proposed RAHMFWFS achieved good performance by improving the prediction performances of SDP models across the selected datasets, compared to existing state-of-the-arts HFS methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareArea Under CurveBayes Theorem

Identifiers

PMID34868291
PMCPMC8635927
OpenAlexW3215087645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.