Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34868162›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Divergent Response Strategies of CsABF Facing Abiotic Stress in Tea Plant: Perspectives From Drought-Tolerance Studies.

Jing Lu, Jinke Du, Liying Tian, Mengshuang Li, Xianchen Zhang, Shihua Zhang, Xiaochun Wan, Qi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of the potato (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of Multi-Perspectives in Tea Breeding and the Main Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Identification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Jinke DuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Liying TianState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Mengshuang LiState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xianchen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Shihua ZhangCollege of Life Science and Health, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaochun WanState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Qi ChenState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Agricultural University · CNWuhan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, the bZIP family plays vital roles in various biological processes, including seed maturation, flower development, light signal transduction, pathogen defense, and various stress responses. Tea, as a popular beverage, is widely cultivated and has withstood a degree of environmental adversity. Currently, knowledge of the bZIP gene family in tea plants remains very limited. In this study, a total of 76

Indexed as

Camellia sinensis (L.)CsABFscultivar variationstresstranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID34868162
PMCPMC8635920
OpenAlexW3213867247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.