ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating job design and cognitive-emotional processes using latent network analysis: associations with performance and emotional well-being in navy personnel.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Warm-Up Strategies at Halftime: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in a Professional Women's Soccer Team.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Real-time monitoring of military health and readiness: a perspective on future research.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- The concept of cognitive readiness: potential solution and opportunity for the Malaysian army.Cognitive processing · 2024Review
- Resilience enhancing programs in the U.S. military: An exploration of theory and applied practice.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024Review
- Implementing Meta-Session Autoregulation Strategies for Exercise - A Scoping Review.International journal of exercise science · 2024Article
- Article
- Suicide Ideation, Plans, and Attempts Among Military Veterans vs Nonveterans With Disability.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Does Wearable-Measured Heart Rate Variability During Sleep Predict Perceived Morning Mental and Physical Fitness?Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2023Article
- Assessment of the activities physiological cost of the defense forces officers in Ukraine using miniature ECG device.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personnel in many professions must remain "ready" to perform diverse activities. Managing individual and collective capability is a common concern for leadership and decision makers. Typical existing approaches for monitoring readiness involve keeping detailed records of training, health and equipment maintenance, or - less commonly - data from wearable devices that can be difficult to interpret as well as raising privacy concerns. A widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness would be invaluable in generating rapid evaluations of current capability directly from personnel. To develop this measure, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 770 Australian military personnel. The 32-item Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) demonstrated good model fit, and comprised nine factors: overall readiness; physical readiness; physical fatigue; cognitive readiness; cognitive fatigue; threat-challenge (i.e., emotional/coping) readiness; skills-and-training readiness; group-team readiness, and equipment readiness. Readiness factors were negatively correlated with recent stress, current negative affect and distress, and positively correlated with resilience, wellbeing, current positive affect and a supervisor's rating of solider readiness. The development of the ARMS facilitates a range of new research opportunities: enabling quick, simple and easily interpreted assessment of individual and group readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.