Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34867222›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2021

Return of the Righting Reflex Does Not Portend Recovery of Cognitive Function in Anesthetized Rats.

Kathleen F Vincent, Edlyn R Zhang, Risako Kato, Angel Cho, Olivia A Moody, Ken Solt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hormonal basis of sex differences in anesthetic sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen F VincentAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts's General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Edlyn R ZhangAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts's General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Risako KatoAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts's General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Angel ChoTouro College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Olivia A MoodyAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts's General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Ken SoltAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts's General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USTouro College · US

Funding

The Anesthetic Circuitry of the MidbrainR01GM126155 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SOLT, KEN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of individuals undergoing general anesthesia rises globally, it becomes increasingly important to understand how consciousness and cognition are restored after anesthesia. In rodents, levels of consciousness are traditionally captured by physiological responses such as the return of righting reflex (RORR). However, tracking the recovery of cognitive function is comparatively difficult. Here we use an operant conditioning task, the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), to measure sustained attention, working memory, and inhibitory control in male and female rats as they recover from the effects of several different clinical anesthetics. In the 5-CSRTT, rats learn to attend to a five-windowed touchscreen for the presentation of a stimulus. Rats are rewarded with food pellets for selecting the correct window within the time limit. During each session we tracked both the proportion of correct (accuracy) and missed (omissions) responses over time. Cognitive recovery trajectories were assessed after isoflurane (2% for 1 h), sevoflurane (3% for 20 min), propofol (10 mg/kg I.V. bolus), ketamine (50 mg/kg I.V. infusion over 10 min), and dexmedetomidine (20 and 35 μg/kg I.V. infusions over 10 min) for up to 3 h following RORR. Rats were classified as having recovered accuracy performance when four of their last five responses were correct, and as having recovered low omission performance when they missed one or fewer of their last five trials. Following isoflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, the majority (63-88%) of rats recovered both accuracy and low omission performance within an hour of RORR. Following ketamine, accuracy performance recovers within 2 h in most (63%) rats, but low omission performance recovers in only a minority (32%) of rats within 3 h. Finally, following either high or low doses of dexmedetomidine, few rats (25-32%) recover accuracy performance, and even fewer (0-13%) recover low omission performance within 3 h. Regardless of the anesthetic, RORR latency is not correlated with 5-CSRTT performance, which suggests that recovery of neurocognitive function cannot be inferred from changes in levels of consciousness. These results demonstrate how operant conditioning tasks can be used to assess real-time recovery of neurocognitive function following different anesthetic regimens.

Indexed as

5-choice serial reaction time taskanesthesiacognitive recoveryconsciousnessemergencereturn of righting reflex

Identifiers

PMID34867222
PMCPMC8637163
OpenAlexW3216111199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.