ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2021
Complexity Collapse, Fluctuating Synchrony, and Transient Chaos in Neural Networks With Delay Clusters.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural circuits operate with delays over a range of time scales, from a few milliseconds in recurrent local circuitry to tens of milliseconds or more for communication between populations. Modeling usually incorporates single fixed delays, meant to represent the mean conduction delay between neurons making up the circuit. We explore conditions under which the inclusion of more delays in a high-dimensional chaotic neural network leads to a reduction in dynamical complexity, a phenomenon recently described as multi-delay complexity collapse (CC) in delay-differential equations with one to three variables. We consider a recurrent local network of 80% excitatory and 20% inhibitory rate model neurons with 10% connection probability. An increase in the width of the distribution of local delays, even to unrealistically large values, does not cause CC, nor does adding more local delays. Interestingly, multiple small local delays can cause CC provided there is a moderate global delayed inhibitory feedback and random initial conditions. CC then occurs through the settling of transient chaos onto a limit cycle. In this regime, there is a form of noise-induced order in which the mean activity variance decreases as the noise increases and disrupts the synchrony. Another novel form of CC is seen where global delayed feedback causes "dropouts," i.e., epochs of low firing rate network synchrony. Their alternation with epochs of higher firing rate asynchrony closely follows Poisson statistics. Such dropouts are promoted by larger global feedback strength and delay. Finally, periodic driving of the chaotic regime with global feedback can cause CC; the extinction of chaos can outlast the forcing, sometimes permanently. Our results suggest a wealth of phenomena that remain to be discovered in networks with clusters of delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.