Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866973›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021

Phytochemical analysis and toxicological evaluation of the ethanolic Leaves extract of

Anthony Uchenna Emeribe, Stanley Obialor Anyanwu, Idongesit Kokoabasi Isong, Uno Remi Bassey, Imeobong Joseph Inyang, Emmanuel Onyekachukwu Ibeneme, Enosakhare Aiyudubie Asemota, Zibril Okhormhe, Bassey Icha, Idris Nasir Abdullahi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony Uchenna EmeribeDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Stanley Obialor AnyanwuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Idongesit Kokoabasi IsongDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Uno Remi BasseyDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Imeobong Joseph InyangDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Onyekachukwu IbenemeDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Enosakhare Aiyudubie AsemotaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Zibril OkhormheDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Bassey IchaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Idris Nasir AbdullahiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
University of Calabar · NGAhmadu Bello University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsTwenty rats (weight range: 75-100 g) were assigned into five study groups, viz; (a) control (without treatment) (b) treatment group 1, orally administered with 50 mg/kg (c) treatment group 2, orally administered with 100 mg/kg (d) treatment group 3, orally administered with 250 mg/kg, and (e) treatment group 4, orally administered with 300 mg/kg of

resultMean serum sodium (p = 0.049), potassium (p = 0.007), and urea (p < 0.001) levels were significantly higher among the treatment groups compared to controls. Histopathological findings of kidney sections revealed mild glomerular infiltration in treatment groups 2-4. Additionally, sclerosis was observed in groups 3-4. Phytochemical analysis of

conclusionFrom the findings in this study,

Indexed as

Hypoestes roseaKidney functionPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID34866973
PMCPMC8626298
OpenAlexW3193044122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.