Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866947›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

A Proactive Approach to Identify the Exposure Risk to COVID-19: Validation of the Pandemic Risk Exposure Measurement (PREM) Model Using Real-World Data.

Simon Grima, Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, Murat Kizilkaya, Inna Romānova, Rebecca Dalli Gonzi, Mihajlo Jakovljevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Assessment: Systematic Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon GrimaDepartment of Insurance, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-5120
Ramona Rupeika-ApogaFaculty of Business, Management and Economics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-3941-0723
Murat KizilkayaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-7554
Inna RomānovaFaculty of Business, Management and Economics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0935-7749
Rebecca Dalli GonziDepartment of Construction & Property Management, University of Malta, Msida, MSD, 2080, Malta.ORCID 0000-0003-2183-8331
Mihajlo JakovljevicInstitute of Comparative Economic Studies ICES, Faculty of Economics, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9160-6846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo statistically validate the PREM (Pandemic Risk Exposure Measurement) model devised in a previous paper by the authors and determine the model's relationship with the level of current COVID-19 cases (NLCC) and the level of current deaths related to COVID-19 (NLCD) based on the real country data.

methodsWe used perceived variables proposed in a previous study by the same lead authors and applied the latest available real data values for 154 countries. Two endogenous real data variables (NLCC) and (NLCD) were added. Data were transformed to measurable values using a Likert scale of 1 to 5. The resulting data for each variable were entered into SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 26 and Amos (Analysis of a Moment Structures) version 21 and subjected to statistical analysis, specifically exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsThe results obtained confirmed a 4-factor structure and that the PREM model using real data is statistically reliable and valid. However, the variable Q14 - hospital beds available per capita (1000 inhabitants) had to be excluded from the analysis because it loaded under more than one factor and the difference between the factor common variance was less than 0.10. Moreover, its Factor 1 and Factor 3 with NLCC and Factor 1 with NLCD showed a statistically significant relationship.

conclusionTherefore, the developed PREM model moves from a perception-based model to reality. By proposing a model that allows governments and policymakers to take a proactive approach, the negative impact of a pandemic on the functioning of a country can be reduced. The PREM model is useful for decision-makers to know what factors make the country more vulnerable to a pandemic and, if possible, to manage or set tolerances as part of a preventive measure.

Indexed as

COVID-19pandemic risk exposurePREMproactivevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID34866947
PMCPMC8637761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.