Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866914›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2021

Durable Response to Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for the Treatment of BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma in Routine Clinical Practice.

Mª Del Carmen Álamo, Sebastian Ochenduszko, Guillermo Crespo, Mónica Corral, Juana Oramas, Pilar Sancho, Javier Medina, Fernando Garicano, Pedro López, Begoña Campos Balea and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pathology and Molecular Biology of Melanoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Mª Del Carmen ÁlamoOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Sebastian OchenduszkoOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Guillermo CrespoOncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Mónica CorralOncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-8701
Juana OramasOncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Pilar SanchoOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Javier MedinaOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
Fernando GaricanoOncology Department, Hospital de Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.
Pedro LópezOncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario General de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Begoña Campos BaleaOncology Department, Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8927-9129
Analia Rodríguez GarzottoMedical Department and Strategy, Roche S.A, Madrid, Spain.
Eva Muñoz-CouseloOncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital de Galdakao · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESRoche (Spain) · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of PATIENTS AND

methodsRetrospective, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involving 41 patients with advanced melanoma harboring a

resultsDuring the combination therapy, 12 patients (29.3%) had a CR, 19 a PR (46.3%), 5 showed SD (12.2%), and 5 had PD. A total of 12 patients (29.3%) were considered as achieving a durable response and 29 (70.7%) as a non-durable one. Practically all sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients. Body mass index was the only differential factor (with higher body mass index achieving a non-durable response). The treatment adherence was 100% in patients with durable response and 66.7% in those with non-durable.

conclusionThe combination treatment with vemurafenib/cobimetinib results in an important impact on long-term survival, leading to a steady CR in one-third of the patients.

Indexed as

BRAFclinical practicecobimetinibdurable responsemetastatic melanomavemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID34866914
PMCPMC8636950
OpenAlexW3214830311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.