ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021
Lighting Standards Revisited: Introduction of a Mathematical Model for the Assessment of the Impact of Illuminance on Visual Acuity.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Introduction of a Modified Luminous Efficiency Function V(λ)' That Addresses Total Light Transmittance of Patients That Underwent Pseudophakic Presbyopic Corrections
Evaluation of the Impact of Light Intensity and Light Temperature on the Efficacy of Presbyopic Corrections With Bilateral Implantation of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in a Series of Activities of Daily Living
Impact of Artificial Lighting on Visual Acuity After Presbyopia Correction With an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: Introduction of a Modified Luminous Efficiency Function V(λ)'
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Spatial Ambient Illumination on Pupil Diameter and Visual Acuity.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Impact of Light Conditions on Visual Performance following Premium Pseudophakic Presbyopia Corrections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrimary objective of present study is to introduce a contemporary methodology for the lighting standards update addressing both normophakic and pseudophakic patients.
methodsFor the sake of our study, we theoretically estimated the intraocular-to-crystalline lens iIluminance ratio (ICIR) and the intraocular lens (IOL) luminous efficiency function
resultsICIR for Panoptix eyes ranged from 54.00% to 55.99%. Both groups had significantly higher UDVA at 550lx compared to 20lx (p < 0.05). CG had significantly higher UDVA than SG at 20lx (7.20 letters, p = 0.045), while no significant difference was detected at 550lx (0.40 letters, p = 0.883). SG required significantly more illuminance than CG to maintain their UDVA (MRIL
conclusionThis is the first study to introduce the CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04263636.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.