ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2021
Recovery of Magnetic Catalysts: Advanced Design for Process Intensification.
Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomagnetic 4-amino-3-hydroxynaphthalene-1-sulfonic as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for multicomponent synthesis of 2-amino-3-cyano-4,6-diarylpyridines under green conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cellulose-functionalized magnetic nanoparticle-mediated isolation of novel cellulolytic bacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modular Attachment of Nanoparticles on Microparticle Supports via Multifunctional Polymers.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The design of microdevices in which components with magnetic character must be separated and recovered from reactive media benefits from the advantages of microfluidics and meets the criteria for process intensification; however, there are open questions, such as the design of the most appropriate magnet arrangement, that need further research in order to increase the magnetic gradient exerted on the particles. Herein, we focus on the continuous recovery of magnetic microparticles, that can be used as support to facilitate the recovery of biocatalysts (magnetic microcatalysts, MMCs) from biological fluids. We analyze and compare the performance of two typical magnetophoretic microdevices for addressing bead recovery: (i) annular channels with a quadrupole orientation of the permanent magnets (quadrupole magnetic sorter, QMS) and (ii) the standard design, which consists of rectangular channels with a single permanent magnet to generate the magnetic field. To this end, an experimentally validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical model has been employed. Our results reveal that for devices with the same width and length, the micro-QMS, in comparison to a rectangular channel, could accomplish the complete particle retrieval while (i) processing more than 4 times higher fluid velocities, treating more than 360 times higher flow rates or (ii) working with smaller particles, thus reducing by 55% the particle mass. Additionally, the parallel performance of ≈300 micro-QMSs fulfills the processing of flow rates as high as 200 L·h
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.